Research Article | Open Access | 10.31586/wastewater101001

Resource Recovery from Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste in Sri Lanka – Current Status and Future Prospects

Abstract

Owing to rapid population growth accompanied by urbanization and industrialization, waste management is an essential aspect of today's world. During 2013, total municipal solid waste generation in Sri Lanka was recorded as 10,768 tons per day, while total municipal solid waste collected was only 3,458 tons per day. Meantime, the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) produced in 2012 was 1,301.5 tons per day. The most widely practiced waste disposal method in Sri Lanka is currently open dumping, which is not an ecofriendly approach. Biowaste, which accounts for about 59% of MSW collected in Sri Lanka, consists of 65 percent of moisture, and valuable resources such as energy, nutrients, and minerals can be readily recovered. Resource recovery, which is linked to the circular economy, is a sophisticated technique of biowaste management. However, resource recovery principles for the local communities in Sri Lanka are fairly novel. The ultimate outcome of this study is to lay the foundation for the development of an autonomous integrated circular system integrated with the existing waste management framework in Sri Lanka, and thus allowing to circulate the vital resources needed to sustain human life in the form of energy, food, and water. Types of resources, which can be extracted from OFMSW are nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous, energy, and water from moisture content. Energy can be harnessed as biogas via the degradation of organic compounds in anaerobic reactors, whereas nutrients can be harnessed by converting anaerobic sludge into inorganic fertilizers. The proposed integrated standalone circular system should be able to produce energy via combined heat and power plant and produce struvite via fertilizer production plant. Based on currently available data from 2012, potential electricity generation is 10.31 W per kg of OFMSW, and minimum struvite generation potential is 3.839 g per kg of OFMSW. Excluding the operation and maintenance expenditure and depreciation cost, forecasted revenue from electricity generation and struvite production are respectively is 21,155,926 USD per annum and 455,926.84 USD per annum. Therefore, resource recovery is a socio-economically and environmentally viable waste management practice in the Sri Lankan context.

1. Introduction

Waste management plays a critical role in mitigating the environmental deterioration caused by the ever-increasing growth of the population accompanied by urbanization and industrialization. The global municipal solid waste (MSW) generation was estimated to be around 1.3 billion tons annually in 2012, and it is predicted to reach 2.2 billion tons annually by 2025 [1]. Moreover, the per capita solid waste generation is accelerating faster than the rate of urbanization as a result of ever-changing urban lifestyle trends. This is clearly evinced from the global per capita MSW generation being increased from 0.64 kg per person in 2002 to 1.2 kg per person in 2012 [2]. Total municipal solid waste generation in Sri Lanka during 2013 was 10,768 tons/day, whereas the total collected municipal solid waste was only 3,458 tons/day [3]. MSW management is one of the key aspects in urban planning to establish essential sanitation standards and environmental norms, and also to mitigate socio-economic and environmental issues associated with MSW. Sri Lanka is a small island located in the middle of the Indian Ocean, which accommodates about 21.8 million people in its 65,610 km² area, and the main capital city Colombo located in Western Province, which covers a 3,684 km² area has a population of 5.8 million people. The population density of Western province alone is 1,574 heads per km², and it is continuously growing as people tend to move to the capital city due to various social and economic considerations.

As a result of ever-rising city dwellers and their growing consumption, urbanization can have detrimental impacts on the ecological system as well as social and economic aspects of the area. Consequently, municipal waste management is an essential element in the process of sustainable development of cities [4]. As similar to most of the other developing countries, in Sri Lanka also, waste treatment is given lesser attention, while the focus is mainly driven in the direction of waste collection due to reasons such as lack of technological knowledge on advanced waste management practices, insufficient finance resources, poor regulatory framework, lack of public awareness, lack of political initiatives, and etc. [5]. Further, most of the solid waste management programs implemented so far have been unable to sustain, mainly due to the lack of socio-economic feasibility [6]. In Sri Lanka, the most commonly practiced waste disposal method is open dumping, while there is a single sanitary landfill located in Gampaha District, and there are very few semi-controlled landfills. Open dumping is a primary technique that most often leads to various health, socio-economic and environmental issues unless it is operated in a well-controlled sanitary landfill.

A major portion of MSW generated in Sri Lanka is biowaste, which is the short-term biodegradable organic fraction. In fact, the total collected municipal solid waste is composed of 59.20% of food waste, which consists of around 65% of moisture [8] and other valuable nutrients and minerals, which can potentially be recovered to use in value-added applications. The average organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) generated in Sri Lanka in 2012 was 1301.5 tons per day [9], and it is escalating due to the population growth and the associated increase of consumption. Therefore, introducing sustainable and advanced waste management practices, which blend with socio-economic aspects of the local communities as well as the environmental norms, are essential for developing an efficient waste management system in Sri Lanka. Resource recovery connected with a circular economy is a growing advanced biowaste management practice all around the world [10]. The concept of resource recovery is fairly novel for the local communities in Sri Lanka. The objective here is to achieve an integrated standalone circular system embedded in the existing systems, and then circulate essential resources such as energy, food, and water to sustain human life [11]. Such an integrated standalone circular system embedded in the existing systems is capable of fulfilling all or partial resource needs by advanced resource recovery practices. The aim of this research is to evaluate the socio-economic and environmental feasibility of resource recovery from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Current Status of Food Waste Management Technologies

There are several conventional waste management technologies, which are currently practiced in Sri Lanka. They are landfilling, incineration, aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion, and using as animal feed [12], as depicted in Figure 1. Among those, the most commonly practiced technology is landfilling, whereas aerobic composting and using as animal feed are also practiced to some extent.

Landfilling is basically carried out either as open dumping or as engineered landfilling. The former is a basic uncontrolled disposal method causing serious environmental issues, while the latter is a more ecofriendly technique in which sanitary landfills are constructed for safe final disposal of solid waste. As OFMSW consists of a high amount of moisture, landfilling causes to generate leachate over time [13]. Unless landfill-generated leachate, which contains toxic substances and pathogens, is properly collected and treated, there is a huge risk of ground water contamination, which leads to detrimental impacts on aquatic life and human health [14]. Moreover, Sri Lanka is a tropical country with a wet-climate and higher humidity, and hence biological activities are comparatively accelerated. Therefore, improper disposal of MSW can cause a rapid spread of diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, typhoid, etc., during rainy seasons. Similarly, improper aerobic composting systems and animal feeding places may equally raise issues to human health and the ecosystem. Therefore, the existing systems need to be integrated and properly managed before moving towards advanced treatment systems. Furthermore, many studies have investigated various effective biological treatment technologies for landfill leachate [15, 16, 17].

Most of the waste collected in Sri Lanka is not properly sorted at the point of collection due to the lack of knowledge and awareness on the source separation practices and their benefits. Total waste collected in Sri Lanka was only around 32.11% from the total waste generation in Sri Lanka, and the rest of the waste was incinerated or composted domestically or dumped at outside places [7, 12]. Mbiba [18] has investigated the household appetite for source separation in Eastern and Southern Africa and shown the positive attitudes of the community. Source separation practices also need to be enhanced by developing simplified waste collection mechanisms and carrying out waste collection awareness sessions for the general public.

According to the Central Environmental Authority in Sri Lanka, the collected waste in Sri Lanka during 2012 consisted of 54.5% short term biodegradable food waste, 10.5% shopping bags, polythene and plastic waste, 6.1% wooden waste, 5.9% long-term biodegradable waste, 3.7% paper waste, 3.1% glass waste, 1.8% metal waste, 2.8% building waste, 2.3% slaughterhouse waste, 1.2% cloth and garment waste, 0.4% hazardous waste and 7.7% other waste [12], and it is shown in Figure 2. This food waste collection per day can be enhanced by improving source separation practices and waste collection mechanisms.

After the source separation and waste collection, the biowaste should be effectively treated to avoid environmental issues, raised particularly by the landfill leachate, which causes eutrophication, death of aquatic lives, spread of diseases, and various other health issues, and the resources are subsequently recovered. Resources recovered from the waste will compensate the overall cost of the process, making solid waste management socio-economically feasible and affordable for countries with poor economies as well [19]. Therefore, an integrated process of source separation and waste collection followed by waste treatment and resource recovery can play a critical role in waste management while following best practices for source separation and waste collection [20].

2.2. Embedding Modern Concepts of Resource Recovery for Treatment of OFMSW

Anaerobic digestion is one of the conventional and robust waste treatment technologies practiced along with aerobic composting in many countries. However, anaerobic digestion has not been a favorable option in Sri Lanka due to the higher capital expenditure (CAPEX) involved and inadequate technical expertise in plant design and operation [21]. Nevertheless, considering the consequences of environmental pollution and human health issues, biowaste treatment is more beneficial towards sustainable development in the long run. In the beginning, the CAPEX and technological adoptability play vital roles in the process of embedding modern concepts of resource recovery for OFMSW in the Sri Lankan context. Types of resources, which can be extracted from OFMSW are nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous, energy from organic compounds, and water from moisture content, and these resources can be used in value-added applications making the overall process economically viable [22].

Among these three resources, the vital resources which can generate revenue are nutrients and energy. Energy can be harnessed as biogas, which is produced by the degradation of organic compounds in anaerobic reactors. Nutrients can be harnessed by converting anaerobic sludge into inorganic fertilizers [23]. The main restraints, which hinder the implementation of this modern process are lack of knowledge, high CAPEX, and uncertainty of commercial viability. This study proposes a novel technology for resource recovery in which an integrated standalone circular system for the management of OFMSW in Sri Lanka is implemented.

2.3. Potential of Nutrient and Energy Recovery from OFMSW

The proposed treatment method for the resource recovery creates a cyclic system, which converts OFMSW to energy and nutrient sources, as depicted in Figure 4. After the source separation, OFMSW is directed to centralized waste collection facilities and then the pretreated waste will be sent to anaerobic reactors for anaerobic degradation [10]. During anaerobic degradation, complex organic compounds such as carbohydrates, proteins and lipids are degraded by anaerobic microorganisms and converted into a mixture of carbon dioxide gas and methane gas, which is known as biogas [23]. This biogas can be either stored for later usage or converted into electricity and thermal energy by a combined heat and power (CHP) plant. Once the degradation is completed, anaerobic digestate can be converted into inorganic fertilizer, which is known as struvite production by chemical treatment. This struvite can be used as inorganic fertilizer for long-term agricultural crops such as tea, coconut and rubber [24]. Once again after food consumption in the cycle, a portion of the nutrients will be recirculated back to the OFMSW collection and storage.

The proposed integrated standalone circular system should be able to produce energy via a CHP plant while producing struvite via a fertilizer production plant [25]. The existing waste collection facilities should be embedded in all phases of design, construction, testing, and commissioning of these two plants within the premises. The physicochemical characteristics of the prepared OFMSW slurry for the anaerobic digestion are given in Table 1. The key process conditions of the proposed anaerobic digestor employed in the study are shown in Table 2. The physicochemical characteristics of typical anaerobic digestate of OFMSW are given in Table 3.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Potential of Energy Recovery

According to the previous research study [9], the potential electricity generations of different provinces are as given in Table 4. The electricity generation is 10.31 W per kg of OFMSW, and hence the current flat tariff for electricity generation from biogas in Sri Lanka is 0.18 USD/kWh. The total annual revenue from the generated electricity, excluding the operation expenditure and depreciation cost, is 21,155,926 USD per annum.

3.2. Potential of Nutrient Recovery

Nutrient recovery also comes with a tremendous value-addition in the process of resource recovery from OFMSW. The Reaction mechanism of the struvite production from anaerobic digestate of OFMSW is given in Equation 1. The process flow diagram of the proposed struvite recovery process [26] is illustrated in Figure 5.

Anaerobic digester sludge   Mg 2+ +  NH 4 +  + PO 4 3+  + 6H 2  MgNH 4 PO 4 6 H 2 O(struvite)

Hence a typical anaerobic digestate of OFMSW consists of 1861 ±  160 mg/l  NH 4 + and 104 ± 12  mg/l  PO 4 3- , phosphate becomes the least available chemical compound for the struvite production process. Based on the assumption that the digestate has 104 ± 12  mg/l  PO 4 3- , struvite crystallization reactors can produce up to 3.839 g struvite per 1 kg of OFMSW. Considering the current struvite market price as 250 USD/ton, the total annual revenue from struvite production, excluding operating expenditure and depreciation cost is 455,926.84 USD per annum.

4. Conclusion

Waste management is becoming a critical aspect in highly populated cities in Sri Lanka due to population growth accompanied by urbanization and industrialization. Currently, source separation practices are being regulated, but without having much focus on waste treatment, where most of the waste ends up in open dump sites or unsanitary landfills, causing serious health, socio-economic and environmental issues. A major portion of the daily waste collection contains biowaste, which can be efficiently converted to energy, nutrients and other value-added products by using novel resource recovery technologies. This research study summarizes the potential of electricity generation from biogas generation via anaerobic digestion of OFMSW and fertilizer production from struvite crystallization of anaerobic digestate of OFMSW. These value-added resources recovered can generate a stream of revenue, compensating the overall operation cost of solid waste management, thus making the solid waste management process socio-economically viable. The outcome of this study will lay the foundation for the development of an autonomous circular system integrated with the existing systems to establish a sustainable waste management system in Sri Lanka.

REFERENCES

  1. S. M. H. D. Perera, C. Wickramasinghe & M. Narayana, Process Parameter Optimization of Urban Biowaste Carbonization, 2020 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), 130-135, 2020.[CrossRef]
  2. Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata, What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management, World Bank, Washington, DC USA, 2012.[Source Link]
  3. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Data Collection Survey on Solid Waste Management in Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka Final Report Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Ten (10) Priority Local Authorities, 2016.
  4. Agata Mesjasz-Lech, Municipal waste management in context of sustainable urban development, 1st International Conference Green Cities 2014 – Green Logistics for Greener Cities, 244-256, 2014.[CrossRef]
  5. Chandana K. Vidanaarachchi, Samuel T.S. Yuen & Sumith Pilapitiya, Municipal solid waste management in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka: Problems, issues and challenges, Waste Management, 26, 920-930, 2006.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. R. Lalitha S. Fernando, Solid waste management of local governments in the Western Province of Sri Lanka: An implementation analysis, Waste Management, 84, 194-203, 2019.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. Patrick A. Hettiaratchi, S. C. Wirasinghe, Sumith Pilapitiya & Nilanthi J. G. J. Bandara, Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study, Enviornmental Monitering and Assessment, 135, 31-39, 2007.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. S. N. M. Menikpura, S. H. Gheewala, & S. Bonnet, Sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management in Sri Lanka: Problems and prospects, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 14, 181–192, 2012.[CrossRef]
  9. B. K. T. Samarasiri, S. W. S. Samarakoon, P. G. Rathnasiri & S. H. P. Gunawardena, Mechanistic Model for Electricity Generation via Biomethane Production through Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste Generated in Sri Lanka, 3rd International Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference, MERCon 2017, 407–412, 2017.[CrossRef]
  10. Y. Ma & Y. Liu, Turning food waste to energy and resources towards a great environmental and economic sustainability: An innovative integrated biological approach, Biotechnology Advances, 37, 2019.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. B. K. T. Samarasiri, Integrated Standalone Circular Systems (ISCS) and Standalone Circular Systems (SCS) towards Global Crisis, Medium, 2020.
  12. Central Environmental Authority Sri Lanka, Database of Municipal Solid Waste in Sri Lanka, 2012.
  13. T. L. Gunaruwan & W. N. Gunasekara, Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Sri Lanka : A Comparative Appraisal of the Economics of Composting, NSBM Journal of Management, 2, 27–45, 2016.[CrossRef]
  14. Magda M. Abd El-Salamab & Gaber I. Abu-Zuidc, Impact of landfill leachate on the groundwater quality: A case study in Egypt, Journal of Advanced Research, 6, 579-586, 2015.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Safaa M. Raghab, Ahmed M. Abd El Meguid & Hala A. Hegazi, Treatment of leachate from municipal solid waste landfill, HBRC Journal, 9, 187-192, 2013.[CrossRef]
  16. Suher Carolina Yabroudia, Dione Mari Moritab & Pedro Alemb, Landfill Leachate Treatment over Nitritation/Denitritation in an Activated Sludge Sequencing Batch Reactor, 4th International Conference on Environmental Science and Development- ICESD 2013, 6, 163-168, 2013.[CrossRef]
  17. Himanshu Chaturved & Priyanka Kaushal, Comparative study of different Biological Processes for non-segregated Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) leachate treatment, Environmental Technology & Innovatio, 9, 134-139, 2018.[CrossRef]
  18. Beacon Mbiba, Urban solid waste characteristics and household appetite for separation at source in Eastern and Southern Africa, Habitat International, 43, 152-162, 2014.[CrossRef]
  19. Asad Iqbala, Xiaoming Liua & Guang-Hao Chen, Municipal solid waste: Review of best practices in application of life cycle assessment and sustainable management techniques, Science of The Total Environment, 729, 2020.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. C. Agency, Data Collection Survey on Solid Waste Management in Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka Final Report, 2016.
  21. C. Riuji, L. Rodi & C. Zurbrügg, Feasibility assessment tool for urban anaerobic digestion in developing countries, Journal of Environmental Management, 126, 122–131, 2013.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wei Peng, Fan Lü, LipingHao, Hua Zhang, Liming Shaoc & Pinjing He, Digestate management for high-solid anaerobic digestion of organic wastes: A review, Bioresource Technology, 297, 2020.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yadvika, Santosh, T. R. Sreekrishnan, S. Kohli, & V. Rana, Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques - A review, Bioresource Technology, 95,1–10, 2004.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Verónica Oliveira, João Labrinch & CéliaDias-Ferreiraa, Extraction of phosphorus and struvite production from the anaerobically digested organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6, 2837-2845, 2018.[CrossRef]
  25. K. S. Le Corre, P. Hobbs, & S. A. Parsons, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization : A Review, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 433-477, 2013.[CrossRef]
  26. T. Ritigala et al., Optimized pre-treatment of high strength food waste digestate by high content aluminum-nanocluster based magnetic coagulation, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 104, 430–443, 2021.[CrossRef]
Article metrics
Views 840
Downloads 44
Citations 0
PDF ePub Xml